Your Guide to Law: Expert Articles & Advice
Key Victory at the Madras High Court – Ex-parte Injunction Vacated in the “BOUNCE” Trademark Dispute
The present matter pertains to a trademark dispute, wherein the Ld. Single Judge of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras vide order dated 24.10.2025 vacated an earlier ex-parte interim injunction that was passed against the respondent on 12.03.2025. The Court found "notable differences" between the plaintiff's simple word mark "BOUNCE" and the respondent's composite mark. The Court further held that there was no justification to curtail the respondent's business operation, which was based exclusively in Udaipur, until the infringement claim could be proved during the full trial, concluding that continuation of the injunction would cause the defendant irreparable damages. The plaintiff’s preferred an appeal against the said order dated 24.10.2025. The Hon’ble Division bench vide order dated 21.11.2025 dismissed the appeals filed by the plaintiff thereby upholding the order of the Ld. Single judge.
5 mins Read
Settlements, Acquiescence, and Section 29(5): Decoding the Madras High Court's ORBIT Ruling
The Madras High Court dealt with a dispute over the use of the trade marks “ORBIT” and “ADL ORBIT” in the cable and wires industry. The 1st plaintiff, Mr. Amit Agarwal, is the registered proprietor of these trademarks and the Director of Seetu Orbit Cable India Pvt. Ltd., the 2nd plaintiff, which uses the marks in trade since 1990.
6 mins Read
Protecting Trademarks as trading style under sec. 29(5): Insights from the Madras High Court's Cotton Mantra Case
In a case involving the registered trademark COTTON MANTRA, the court granted an interim injunction in favour of M/s. Sadhana Fashion, effectively safeguarding their intellectual property against the defendants for trademark infringement and passing off. This ruling reinforces the principles enshrined in Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which ensures robust protection for registered trademarks, even when used as a trading style. The judgment stands as a testament to the strength of India's trademark laws in defending intellectual property rights.
3 mins Read
VICTORY FOR M/S. ELECTRICAL FITTINGS & EQUIPMENT (MADRAS) PVT. LTD. IN A 14 YEAR TRADEMARK DISPUTE.
M/s.-- Electrical Fittings & Equipment (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. secured a landmark victory in a 14-year trademark dispute against Eveready Industries India Ltd. over the mark "EVERLITE." The Trade Mark Registry upheld the applicant’s rights, emphasizing the distinction between "EVERLITE" and "EVEREADY" in phonetic, visual, and structural aspects. The decision highlighted the applicant’s prior and continuous use of "EVERLITE" since 1971, rejecting Eveready’s claims of confusion and the selective opposition. The ruling reaffirmed that intellectual property rights favor bona fide and consistent use over well-known mark status alone, ensuring fairness and justice in trademark law.
